家族企业产权制度变迁路径

国内外家族企业发展的历史证明。产权的逐渐多元化和社会化是必然趋势。单一的产权结构不仅限制了家族企业筹集资金的能力。而且限制了家族企业的人才结构，无法满足企业扩展的要求。因此，对于处在扩张阶段的我国家族企业而言，必须突破产权关。实现家族企业的产权变迁。     

标准化在与国际惯例接轨中的民族性浅议

本文从标准化的定义与实践切入，揭示了标准化在与国际惯例接轨中应当坚持对等原则，双方一致原则及民族性的必要性，并针对误区提出了解决对策     

基于制度变迁理论的政府投资项目管理模式探讨

运用制度变迁理论，分析了我国政府投资项目管理模式的制度需求、中央政府和地方政府在政府投资项目管理模式制度变迁中的主体地位、强制性和诱导性两种制度变迁方式，强调在制度创新过程中应当注意制度变迁效率。     

New Technology in Unionized Firms: Advantages of Mandatory Bargaining

U.S. Labor Law currently allows employers whose work forces are unionized to introduce new technologies without bargaining over the decision to do so. This forces unions to adopt inefficient strategies when negotiating collective bargaining agreements in an effort to minimize the impact of technological change on their members. Allowing unions to bargain over the decision to introduce new technologies would obviate their having to resort to these inefficient strategies. In addition, it might increase the likelihood of employees suggesting alterations in production processes that would increase the rate of technological change. For these reasons, this article advocates amending U.S. labor law to require employers to bargain over the introduction of new technologies.     

农民工的社会网络变迁

采用系统模式研究了进城农民工的社会网络重构过程,指出随着谋生方式由农业生产向非农产业的转移,进城农民工正在逐步建立起以业缘关系为基础的新的社会纽带,并使之成为其社会网络的重要组成部分.这些由进城农民工一手构建的社会关系网络正在成为他们在城市生活中赖以生存和发展的重要资本.     

企业技术创新风险的聚类分析:一项实证研究

技术创新已经成为许多企业在市场竞争中获得竞争优势的重要途径,但是各种风险因素的存在使得企业技术创新的成功率并不高。以问卷调查为基础,以有向聚类为工具,通过实证分析对各种技术创新风险因素进行了聚类,归纳出了相对重要的风险因素。对这些因素的提炼,有助于企业理解并缓解技术创新的风险。     

以战略变革跨跃技术间断--基于技术与战略相匹配的视角

技术间断具有三个基本特征:利益隐蔽性、思维锁定性和市场破坏性。前瞻性、学习性和灵活性是战略变革的三大特性,也是战略变革成功跨越技术间断的前提条件。战略变革可以应对技术间断;技术间断为战略变革提供了良好契机;战略变革会引发新的技术间断。     

论制度变迁的成本约束

制度变迁的关键是成本约束，这是制度本身产生的根本性要求。制度变迁是成本和收益相权衡和比较的产物，制度设计和安排必须充分考虑到制度变迁的成本和收益，减少制度变迁的阻力，提高制度运行的效率。     

Technological change in energy systems: Learning curves, logistic curves and input-output coefficients

Learning curves have recently been widely adopted in climate-economy models to incorporate endogenous change of energy technologies, replacing the conventional assumption of an autonomous energy efficiency improvement. However, there has been little consideration of the credibility of the learning curve. The current trend that many important energy and climate change policy analyses rely on the learning curve means that it is of great importance to critically examine the basis for learning curves. Here, we analyse the use of learning curves in energy technology, usually implemented as a simple power function. We find that the learning curve cannot separate the effects of price and technological change, cannot reflect continuous and qualitative change of both conventional and emerging energy technologies, cannot help to determine the time paths of technological investment, and misses the central role of R&D activity in driving technological change. We argue that a logistic curve of improving performance modified to include R&D activity as a driving variable can better describe the cost reductions in energy technologies. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the top-down Leontief technology can incorporate the bottom-up technologies that improve along either the learning curve or the logistic curve, through changing input-output coefficients. An application to UK wind power illustrates that the logistic curve fits the observed data better and implies greater potential for cost reduction than the learning curve does.     

复杂产品系统的技术创新及其风险分析

随着复杂产品系统在当今的经济社会中扮演着越来越重要的角色,其创新过程也就成为技术创新研究领域的一大热点。探讨了复杂产品系统的定义、内涵,总结了复杂产品系统的特征,概括了复杂产品系统创新的关键风险因素,并分析了复杂产品系统的技术创新过程,最后得出了进行创新风险管理的途径。